The Sexuality Institutional Review Board Resource Repository is not affiliated with Widener University's Institutional Review Board.
Henrickson, M., Giwa, S., Hafford-Letchfield, T., Cocker, C., Mulé, N. J., Schaub, J., & Baril, A. (2020). Research ethics with gender and sexually diverse persons. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6615. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186615
Irvine, J. M. (2012). Can’t ask, can’t tell: How institutional review boards keep sex in the closet. Contexts, 11(2), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504212446457
Irvine, J. M. (2014). Is sexuality research ‘dirty work’? Institutionalized stigma in the production of sexual knowledge. Sexualities, 17(5–6), 632–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713516338
Jaffe, A. E., DiLillo, D., Hoffman, L., Haikalis, M., & Dykstra, R. E. (2015). Does it hurt to ask? A meta-analysis of participant reactions to trauma research. Clinical Psychology Review, 40, 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.004
Johnson, B., Harrison, L. & Ollis, D. (2020). Resisting ethics over-regulation in research into sexuality and relationships education: Insights from an Australian study. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47, 741–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00373-9
Keene, S. (2021). Becoming a sexademic: Reflections on a ‘dirty’ research project. Sexualities, 25(5-6), 1234-1252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460720986915
Kuyper , L., de Wit, J., Adam, P., & Woertman , L. (2012). Doing more good than harm? The effects of participation in sex research on young people in the Netherlands. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 497– 506 <<REVIEW FOR FIT>>
Kuyper, L., Wijsen, C., & de Wit, J. (2014). Distress, need for help, and positive feelings derived from participation in sex research: Findings of a population study in the Netherlands. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(3), 351-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.736092
Msibi, T. (2014). Contextualising ‘dirty work’: A response to Janice Irvine (2014). Sexualities, 17(5/6), 669-673. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460714531278
Noland, C. M. (2012). Institutional barriers to research on sensitive topics: Case of sex communication research among university students. Journal of Research Practice, 8(1), 1-9. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ998231.pdf
Rinehart, J. K., Nason, E. E., Yeater, E. A., & Miller, G. F. (2016). Do some students need special protection from research on sex and trauma? New evidence for young adult resilience in “sensitive topics” research. The Journal of Sex Research, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1156047
Webber, V. & Brunger, F. (2018). Assessing risk to researchers: Using the case of sexuality research to inform research ethics board guidelines. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3062
Wiederman, M. W. (1999). Sexuality research, institutional review boards, and subject pools. In G. Chastain & R. E. Landrum (Eds.), Protecting Human Subjects: Departmental Subject Pools and Institutional Review Boards (pp. 201-219). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10322-009
Wiederman, M. W. (2002). Institutional review boards and conducting sexuality research. In M. W. Wiederman & B. E. Whitley (Eds.), Handbook for Conducting Research on Human Sexuality (pp. 479-504). Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.
Yeater, E., Miller, G., Rinehart, J., & Nason, E. (2012, 05/22). Trauma and sex surveys meet minimal risk standards: Implications for institutional review boards. Psychological Science, 23, 780-787. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435131
Hammond, N., & Kingston, S. (2014). Experiencing stigma as sex work researchers in professional and personal lives. Sexualities, 17(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713516333
Huysamen, M., & Sanders, T. (2021). Institutional ethics challenges to sex work researchers: Committees, communities, and collaboration. Sociological Research Online, 26(4), 942–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804211002847
Sinha, S. (2017). Ethical and safety issues in doing sex work research: Reflections from a field-based ethnographic study in Kolkata, India. Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316669338
Fisher, C.B. & Mustanski, B. (2014), Reducing health disparities and enhancing the responsible conduct of research involving LGBT youth. Hastings Center Report, 44, S28-S31. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.367
Harger, B. and Quintela, M. (2017), The IRB as Gatekeeper: Effects on Research with Children and Youth. In Harger, B. & Quintela, M. (Eds.) Researching Children and Youth: Methodological Issues, Strategies, and Innovations (pp. 11-33). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-466120180000022002
Macapagal, K., Coventry, R., Arbeit, M.R. et al. (2017). “I won’t out myself just to do a survey”: Sexual and gender minority adolescents’ perspectives on the risks and benefits of sex research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1393–1409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0784-5
Mathews, B., MacMillan, H. L., Meinck, F., Finkelhor, D., Haslam, D., Tonmyr, L., Gonzalez, A., Afifi, T. O., Scott, J. G., Pacella, R. E., Higgins, D. J., Thomas, H., Collin-Vézina, D., & Walsh, K. (2022). The ethics of child maltreatment surveys in relation to participant distress: Implications of social science evidence, ethical guidelines, and law. Child Abuse & Neglect, 123, 105424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105424
Mustanski, B. (2011). Ethical and regulatory issues with conducting sexuality research with LGBT adolescents: A call to action for a scientifically informed approach. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 673–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9745-1
Mustanski, B., & Fisher, C. B. (2016). HIV rates are increasing in gay/bisexual teens: IRB barriers to research must be resolved to bend the curve. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(2), 249–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.026
Mustanski, B., Coventry, R., Macapagal, K., Arbeit, M.R. & Fisher, C.B. (2017), Sexual and gender minority adolescents’ views on HIV research participation and parental permission: A mixed-methods study. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 4, 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12027
Robinson, K. H., & Davies, C. (2014). Doing sexuality research with children: Ethics, theory, methods and practice. Global Studies of Childhood, 4(4), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2014.4.4.250
Santelli, J. S., Smith Rogers, A., Rosenfeld, W. D., DuRant, R. H., Dubler, N., Morreale, M., English, A., Lyss, S., Wimberly, Y., & Schissel, A. (2003). Guidelines for adolescent health research: A position paper of the society for adolescent medicine. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33(5), 396-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.06.009
Ybarra, M. L., Prescott, T. L., Phillips, G. L., Parsons, J. T., Bull, S. S., & Mustanski, B. (2016). Ethical considerations in recruitingoOnline and implementing a text messaging–based HIV prevention program with gay, bisexual, and queer adolescent m. Journal of Adolescent Health, 59(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.020
Cattaneo, L. B., Stylianou, A. M., Hargrove, S., Goodman, L. A., Gebhard, K. T., & Curby, T. W. (2021). Survivor-centered practice and survivor empowerment: Evidence from a research–practitioner partnership. Violence Against Women, 27(9), 1252-1272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220935196
Ghanbarpour, S., Palotai, A., Kim, M. E., Aguilar, A., Flores, J., Hodson, A., ... & Shim, H. (2018). An exploratory framework for community-led research to address intimate partner violence: A case study of the survivor-centered advocacy project. Journal of family violence, 33(8), 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9987-y
Gill, A. (2018). Survivor-centered research: Towards an intersectional gender-based violence movement. Journal of family violence, 33(8), 559-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9993-0
Hague, G., & Mullender, A. (2006). Who listens? The voices of domestic violence survivors in service provision in the United Kingdom. Violence Against Women, 12(6), 568-587. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780120628913
Kelly, J., Murray, C. E., & Crowe, A. (2017). See the Triumph Survivor Advocacy Training Program: Equipping survivors of abuse to engage in social justice advocacy. Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy, 4(2), 114-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/2326716X.2017.1322928
Koss, M. P., White, J. W., & Lopez, E. C. (2017). Victim voice in reenvisioning responses to sexual and physical violence nationally and internationally. American Psychologist, 72(9), 1019. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000233
Kulkarni, S. (2019). Intersectional trauma-informed intimate partner violence (IPV) services: Narrowing the gap between IPV service delivery and survivor needs. Journal of Family Violence, 34(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-0001-5
Martel, A., & Walton-Roberts, M. (2020). Scaling a Survivor-Centric Approach for Survivors of Sexual Violence: The case of an action-based research project in India. In Routledge Handbook of Gender and Feminist Geographies (pp. 308-317). Routledge.
McGirr, S. A., & Sullivan, C. M. (2017). Critical consciousness raising as an element of empowering practice with survivors of domestic violence. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(2), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2016.1212777
Murray, C. E., King, K., Crowe, A., & Flasch, P. (2015). Survivors of intimate partner violence as advocates for social change. Journal for Social Action in Counseling & Psychology, 7(1), 84-100. https://doi.org/10.33043/JSACP.7.1.84-100
Ragavan, M. I., Thomas, K., Medzhitova, J., Brewer, N., Goodman, L. A., & Bair-Merritt, M. (2019). A systematic review of community-based research interventions for domestic violence survivors. Psychology of Violence, 9(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000183
Rossiter, K., Porteous, T., & Dhillon, M. (2020). Critical components of a survivor-centered response to campus sexual violence. In Crocker, D., Minaker, J., & Neuland, A. (Eds.) Violence Interrupted: Confronting Sexual Violence on University Campuses, (pp. 21-44). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv176ktr9
Rowntree, M. (2010). ‘Living life with grace is my revenge’: Situating survivor knowledge about sexual violence. Qualitative Social Work, 9(4), 447-460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325009345786
Stavrevska, E. (2019, Dec. 10). Enter intersectionality: Towards an inclusive survivor-centered approach in responding to conflict-related sexual violence. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/wps/2019/12/10/enter-intersectionality-towards-an-inclusive-survivor-centred-approach-in-responding-to-conflict-related-sexual-violence/
White, J. W., & Sienkiewicz, H. C. (2018). Victim empowerment, safety, and perpetrator accountability through collaboration: A crisis to transformation conceptual model. Violence against women, 24(14), 1678-1696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217743341
Wilson, J. M., & Goodman, L. A. (2021). “A Community of Survivors”: A grounded theory of organizational support for survivor-advocates in domestic violence agencies. Violence against women, 27(14), 2664-2686. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220981143
Zosky, D. (2011). A matter of life and death: The voices of domestic violence survivors. Affilia, 26(2), 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109911405494